Tag Archives: #roxanegay

Review: Bad Feminist, Roxane Gay

This image displays Bad Feminist, a hot pink book with a stylized drawing of Roxane Gay on the cover, leaning off the edge of a wooden bookshelf. Tucked properly on the shelf is also Gay's memoir, Hunger.TL;DR spoiler-free review: a collection of essays analyzing (pop) culture and what it means to be a feminist. Roxane Gay is insightful, funny, and brutally honest. Read also: Hunger.

You’re-verbose-and-I-like-it review: I think the best compliment I could give an author is to say that reading their book makes me want to seek out more of their work. I read Roxane Gay’s Hunger last year, which led me to Bad Feminist, which will soon lead me to one of her novels.

Writing style is something to which I always pay attention because it can give the reader a lot of insight. For example, Gay occasionally writes in short blunt sentences, which I find works well to convey her frustration. She also has this interesting way of doubling back on herself to emphasize her point. Consider the following from the chapter, “How to Be Friends with Another Woman”:

Don’t flirt, have sex, or engage in emotional affairs with your friends’ significant others. This shouldn’t need to be said, but it needs to be said. That significant other is an asshole, and you don’t want to be involved with an asshole who’s used goods. If you want to be with an asshole, get a fresh asshole of your very own. They are abundant.

It is obvious, toward the end of the paragraph, that she’s frustrated, not only because this has to be said, but also because there is an abundance of assholes with which to deal. I chose this quote because it is an excellent example of how she repeats herself, but not in a redundant way. “This shouldn’t need to be said, but it needs to be said” is a poetic way of saying “things should be one way but they are another.” This stylistic choice shows up a bit in this book and a lot in Hunger and I find it so compelling how she is able to say two things while using the words to say only one.

These essays were written for a variety of sources over time and later compiled into Bad Feminist. Structurally, Gay gathers her articles under several subject headings (Gender & Sexuality, Race & Entertainment, Politics, Gender & Race, and Me). I’m always a bit torn on compilations like this. On one hand, I like that the essays are relatively short and give me a brief look into her opinion on an array of issues, but on the other hand, I would have really enjoyed a deep dive into a few specific topics. Regardless, I enjoyed this book because she is always insightful, her wit is razor-sharp, and her humour is my kind of dry.

What stays with me most is the concept of what it means to be a feminist. Gay says that she used to believe that feminists were man-hating. bra-burning, sexless, angry women and turned away from the label because she didn’t want to be identified with those characteristics. This is such a clever trick of the patriarchy; turn the movement meant to liberate women against them. Gay goes on to say things like “Pink is my favorite color”, “I read Vogue, and I’m not doing it ironically”, and “I know nothing about cars.” Do these things make her a bad feminist? Lately I have wondered what kind of feminist I am. I do not participate in community events and I have never been to a protest. This is not to say that I never would or that I am unwilling, I’ve just never sought out those opportunities. I read a lot and I have opinions. I suppose I’m a feminist but I’m not an activist. Can I be the former without being the latter? Gay says “the idea of a sisterhood menaces me, quietly, reminding me of how bad a feminist I am.” Perhaps this is another trick that we are about to fall for; if women don’t identify as feminists because they think they aren’t good enough, or they think other feminists with judge them, then they will not add their voice to the cause. Divided, we are weak, sort of thing.

All this self-reflection is to say that Roxane Gay brought me to the conclusion that she herself landed on: “I would rather be a bad feminist than no feminist at all.”

1 Comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Week 1: Bad Feminist, The Beauty Myth, and Future Home of the Living God

week 1.jpg

Bad Feminist, Roxane Gay: I read Roxane Gay’s Hunger last year, which was incredible. I feel like there’s nothing I can say about it without taking away from how powerful it was, so I will say nothing but “go read it.” I’m really looking forward to Bad Feminist because I love her writing style, her humour, and her take-no-shit attitude (I follow her on Twitter; she is savage and I love it).

The Beauty Myth, Naomi Wolf: Last year I discovered the fat positive movement. A whole stack of my To Read pile consists of books relating to body positivity and fat activism. This, coupled with a complete overhaul of my social media (following fat positive accounts, actively blocking harmful advertisements, etc), has resulted in a huge shift in perspective. That thinking connected easily with my feminist viewpoints and so that brings me to The Beauty Myth. There are several feminist texts on my list but I thought I would start with a classic. I expect to come out of this book empowered by statistics that will thrill my feminist friends and irritate my troglodyte boyfriend.

Future Home of the Living God, Louise Erdrich: I love a good science fiction premise, especially something headed toward or occurring in an apocalypse (but easy on the zombies. I’m pretty done with the undead). This book takes place in a world where evolution has stopped and the world is falling into chaos. The urgency is heightened by the fact that the main character is pregnant. The basic premise is making me tense so I’m willing to bet I’ll fly through this in a day.

Random musing: I was never interested in audiobooks because I’ve always taken pleasure from holding a physical book in my hands. With that in mind, my obsession to get back to reading clashed with my annual tradition of hand-making Christmas presents for family members, so I decided to give Audible a try. Now I am even more torn between owning the physical book and the ability to knit/stitch and read at the same time! Most of my To Read pile is in print, because I also have an online shopping addiction, but I think I’m going to continue enjoying audiobooks in the future. Am I weird and crazy to also buy the print book, just to say I own it? Legit question, looking for feedback here. 🙂

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized